Back to blog
·6 min read

Why Documentation Matters for Developer Productivity

The real cost of undocumented code and how automatic documentation can transform your team's productivity.

CST

Code Summary Team

Author

Best PracticesProductivity

Picture this: It's Monday morning. You've been assigned to fix a critical bug in a service you've never touched. You open the repository and find... nothing. No README. No architecture docs. No comments explaining why anything exists. Just thousands of lines of code staring back at you.

Sound familiar?

This is the reality for most developers. We spend enormous amounts of time not writing code, but trying to understand code that already exists. And when that code is undocumented, understanding it takes exponentially longer.

Let's talk about why this matters and what we can do about it.

The Real Cost of No Documentation

When code isn't documented, here's what actually happens:

Onboarding takes forever. New developers join your team and spend weeks just figuring out how things work. They interrupt senior devs constantly with questions. They're afraid to touch anything because they don't understand what might break.

Knowledge walks out the door. When someone leaves the company, their understanding of the codebase leaves with them. All those architectural decisions, all those "why we did it this way" explanations—gone. The remaining team is left to reverse-engineer everything.

Simple changes become scary. Nobody wants to touch the old service because nobody understands it. So it sits there, accumulating tech debt, becoming more and more fragile. Eventually it becomes the thing that wakes people up at 3 AM.

Debugging takes forever. When you don't understand how something is supposed to work, figuring out why it's broken is exponentially harder. You're not just fixing a bug—you're simultaneously trying to understand the entire system.

Tribal knowledge becomes a bottleneck. A few senior developers become the only people who can work on certain parts of the codebase. They become overwhelmed with questions and context-switching. The team's velocity craters.

None of this is hypothetical. This is what happens every day at companies of all sizes. The cost is real, even if it doesn't show up on a balance sheet.

Why Documentation Doesn't Get Written

If documentation is so important, why doesn't it exist? A few reasons:

It's not the fun part. Developers want to write code, not prose. Documentation feels like bureaucracy, like paperwork, like something that slows you down.

It gets outdated immediately. You write beautiful documentation explaining how the system works. Three sprints later, half of it is wrong. Now it's worse than no documentation because it's actively misleading.

There's no time. Deadlines are tight. Features need shipping. Documentation always gets pushed to "later," and later never comes.

Nobody reads it anyway. Or at least that's the perception. Why spend time writing docs if people are just going to Slack you questions anyway?

These are legitimate problems. Traditional documentation—manually written, manually maintained—is genuinely difficult to sustain. But the solution isn't to give up on documentation entirely.

A Different Approach

What if documentation could be generated automatically? What if it updated itself whenever the code changed? What if keeping docs current required zero ongoing effort?

This is where AI changes the equation.

AI can analyze code and understand what it does. Not perfectly, not the way a senior developer would explain it, but well enough to be useful. Well enough to give someone a starting point. Well enough to answer the question "what does this codebase do and how is it organized?"

And crucially, AI doesn't get tired. It doesn't have deadlines. It doesn't decide that documentation can wait until next sprint. It just runs, every time code changes, keeping documentation in sync automatically.

This doesn't replace human-written documentation for the really important stuff—the "why" behind decisions, the gotchas that only experience reveals. But it creates a foundation. A baseline. Something that exists instead of nothing.

What Good Documentation Actually Provides

When you have solid documentation, here's what changes:

Onboarding accelerates. New developers can read the docs before asking questions. They understand the lay of the land. They can start contributing faster because they're not starting from zero.

Knowledge persists. When someone leaves, their knowledge isn't entirely lost. The documentation captures at least the "what" of how things work, even if some of the "why" is gone.

Context is preserved. Six months from now, when you need to modify something you built today, you won't be starting from scratch. The documentation will remind you how it works and why you built it that way.

AI tools work better. If you're using GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or any AI coding assistant, documentation gives them context. Better context means better suggestions. The AI stops hallucinating functions that don't exist because it actually understands your codebase.

Code reviews improve. Reviewers can check changes against documented architecture. They can verify that modifications align with the intended design. They spend less time asking "wait, what does this service do again?"

Making Documentation Sustainable

The key to documentation that actually works is reducing the effort required to maintain it. Here's what that looks like in practice:

Automate the boring parts. Structure, organization, component relationships, API signatures—all of this can be generated automatically. Save human effort for the insights that require human judgment.

Update continuously. Documentation that updates on every push doesn't go stale. There's no "documentation debt" accumulating. The docs always reflect the current state of the code.

Make it accessible. Documentation that lives in a wiki nobody can find is almost as bad as no documentation. Put it in the repo, in the PR, somewhere developers actually look.

Start with something. Perfect documentation isn't the goal. Something is better than nothing. A generated overview that's 80% accurate is infinitely more useful than a blank page.

The Compounding Effect

Here's the thing about documentation that people miss: the benefits compound over time.

Day one, documentation helps onboard one new developer faster. Month six, it's helped onboard five developers faster. Year two, it's prevented countless hours of "what does this do?" conversations. Year three, it's the reason you can still maintain that service the original author left two years ago.

Each hour saved compounds. Each question not asked frees up time. Each piece of knowledge preserved prevents future pain.

The cost of creating documentation is paid once. The benefits accrue forever.

Getting Started

If your codebase doesn't have documentation today, that's okay. Most don't. The question is whether you're going to do something about it.

Manual documentation is better than nothing, but it's hard to maintain. AI-generated documentation is easier to sustain and keeps itself current.

Code Summary generates documentation automatically for your GitHub repositories. Set it up once, and documentation happens on every push. No ongoing effort required.

Your future self—and your future teammates—will thank you.